Richmond(Pa_Fo)--AFF

Aff Navy / Kentucky Version “There is Only One World!” Our philosophical event is the visa as a rupture—a rupture to position the framework of the debate in contrast to the stark realism of “existence-politics” and external scenarios for catastrophe. Three criteria allow us to talk about a “philosophical situation” as a reason to vote affirmative: ** __ First, Step One: Usher in the Foreign __ **. ** __Rhetoric and transgression are possible.__ ** Increase and expand visas to all those desiring entrance. ** Badiou, ’09  ** (‘Thinking the Event” // Badiou and Zizek; Philosophy in the Present //, 2009) __ Of course, ** philosophy can work on the basis of political signs  ** __, __ Philosophical commitment is **  marked by its internal foreignness  **. __    And, We stand resolved as debater-scholars advocating the rhetorical effects of our statement. We live on one planet, in one world, yet divisions and exclusions continue to multiply. ** These exclusions do not have to persist. ** Why separate ourselves from our initial standpoint in the debate? Why start the separation between inside and outside? We must be uncompromising on this point. ** Badiou,  ** Ethicist, **  ’10  ** (Alain. The Meaning of Sarkozy. London: Verso Publishing, 2008. Pg.) __The problem__ then __has to be reversed.____ 'There is only one world, that of living women and men.' __ Our universal is against the erasure of undocumented immigrants as human beings---if the negative would have us draw lines between types of humans, it will immediately destroy human all human value. Should the U.S. increase visa availability? TAKE THIS UNDECIDABLE and DECIDE in the HERE and NOW. ** Badiou, ’09  ** (‘Thinking the Event” // Badiou and Zizek; Philosophy in the Present //, 2009 “Editor’s Preface”) Thesis 4 __ A universal initially presents itself as a decision about an undecidable __ __ drop the expression 'illegal immigrant' __ [clandestin]. ** __ Second. Framework. __ ** We believe it is important to note the standpoint of debaters advocating change here in this room. Our agency as human beings in this debate—whether it stems from our views of scholarship and the resolution as an artifact, a more localized view of fiat itself, or an interpretation of the need to be resolved—is the starting point for meaning and debate. We are all responsible for a discursive practice that allows the exclusion of different ways of speaking/living. ** Lysacker, ** U. Oregon, ’** 08 ** (John, “Life Takes Visa” // The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, // New Series, Volume 22, Number 2, 2008, pp. 71-81    If David Byrne is right, __ we have __ let the days go by,      __ social practices, lifeworld structures, forms of life, each of which includes some human (and more than human) lives. __      Thus, Unite Framework with the Recognition that Capitalism Must be Negotiated.      We fight both of these trends, turning capitalism into a terrain for the affirmative because our scholarship is both local and engaged.     **  Badiou, 1982  ** (// The Theory of the Subject //, rprnt ’09 p.26)     __ The specification of the __// fundamental // __ contradiction of the means of production __.     We can negotiate capitalism with a philosophical approach that depends on a decision. Our decision is that there is “One World.” This move is not the universal structure they will assume it is—our universal practice of inclusion is ultimately a practice made possible by our statement. ** Badiou, ’09  ** ( ‘Thinking the Event” // Badiou and Zizek; Philosophy in the Present //, 2009) Thesis 5 The universal has an implicative form. __ an invention of consequences, which will prove to be as infinite as the situation itself ____. __    Through a topic advocating visas--the process of EXODUS--we can finally advocate the roots of a critique of capitalist ontology, encouraging debate as a technology of citizenship to move away from the shallow push for "deliberative citizenship" and more toward the more radical outpouring of the orator communist. ** Ronald Greene continues in 2006  ** ( Greene, Prof. Comm. U. Minnesota, 06 (“Orator Communist”, Ronald Walter, //Philosophy and Rhetoric// 39.1 (2006) 85-95)    __ In a world where money and speech are fused __ of the multitude. 3     ** __ Third. Ethics. __ ** Our defense of the resolution upholds an argument that allows us to claim this moment as a philosophical event and defend “One World” through its performative force and its emergence through rhetorical criticism, two links that will guide our framework and our advocacy.      Our impact is Democratic Euthanasia—a fate worse than death: Anything relating Visas and the Status of People to conditions, to contingency, is the construction of the finite. The philosophy of finitude in terms of citizenship in the total and complete submission to democratic euthanasia. Democratic euthanasia is a bigger implication than extinction. ** Badiou, ’09  ** (‘Thinking the Event” // Badiou and Zizek; Philosophy in the Present //, 2009) Thesis 7 Every universal singularity remains incompletable or open The only commentary required by this thesis concerns the manner in which __ philosophers in the present __. Finally, we can negotiate the State to avoid these impacts, but we must be wary of actions that justify the State’s ability to “count people.” Such actions in the context of debate should be dismissed as unethical. Pierre ** Legrand **, professor of Law and Comparative Legal Studies at the Sorbonne in Paris, (** 2008 **) ( “BAD // U //... ?” Cardozo Law Review 29.5 . p. 2194-2199. ) An incontrovertible point of departure would appear to be __ the State __, __ not counted by the State __ ,
 * __ Pa/Fo (Richmond Christine Parker and Ashley Fortner)  __ **